Table 2
Round 3�Current (C) and Future (F) Ratings
Counselor Task Items Rated 5, 4, or 31 for Use of CRT2 to Perform the Task by � 50% Panelists
Counselor and Technologist Combined Ratings N=21
|
C3 |
F4 |
Counselor Task Category |
Counselor Task Item |
% C5 |
% F6 |
f -C7 |
f -F8 |
M-C9 |
M-F10 |
|
6 |
6 |
Marketing |
01�Advertising preparation |
95% |
100% |
20 |
21 |
3.90 |
4.95 |
|
16 |
14 |
02�Advertising delivery |
91% |
100% |
19 |
21 |
3.16 |
4.86 |
|
|
20 |
21 |
47�List of services/self-help guides |
100% |
100% |
21 |
20 |
3.10 |
4.15 |
|
|
12 |
27 |
03�Community service presentations |
80% |
100% |
17 |
21 |
3.24 |
4.05 |
|
|
13 |
11 |
Record-keeping |
04�Externally required forms |
86% |
100% |
18 |
21 |
3.17 |
4.90 |
|
11 |
12 |
06�Internal/Counselor-generated forms |
91% |
100% |
19 |
21 |
3.32 |
4.86 |
|
|
14 |
13 |
05�Client-generated forms |
86% |
100% |
18 |
21 |
3.17 |
4.86 |
|
|
24 |
23 |
48�Case management organizer |
95% |
100% |
20 |
21 |
3.05 |
4.14 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
Therapy |
24�Follow-up |
76% |
100% |
16 |
21 |
3.13 |
4.71 |
|
25 |
22 |
�Initial evaluation |
12�Client demographics |
91% |
100% |
19 |
21 |
3.05 |
4.14 |
|
26 |
28 |
18�Homework assignments |
91% |
100% |
19 |
21 |
3.00 |
4.05 |
|
|
35 |
�Initial evaluation |
13�Personal/family history |
95% |
20 |
3.95 |
||||
|
37 |
�Initial evaluation |
14�Clinical history |
95% |
20 |
3.90 |
||||
|
39 |
�Interventions |
23�Other |
86% |
18 |
3.17 |
||||
|
40 |
�Interventions |
21�Behavioral |
91% |
19 |
3.16 |
||||
|
41 |
10�Group prescreening |
95% |
19 |
3.11 |
|||||
|
42 |
�Initial evaluation |
11�Presenting problem |
91% |
19 |
3.11 |
||||
|
43 |
�Interventions |
20�Cognitive |
86% |
18 |
3.11 |
||||
|
44 |
07�Establish rapport |
76% |
16 |
3.06 |
|||||
|
46 |
16�Develop treatment plan |
95% |
20 |
3.05 |
|||||
|
47 |
�Interventions |
22�Combined |
95% |
20 |
3.05 |
||||
|
48 |
09�Overview of problem |
95% |
20 |
3.00 |
|||||
|
49 |
15�Establish goals |
91% |
19 |
3.00 |
|||||
|
2 |
5 |
Assessment |
26�Test scoring |
91% |
100% |
19 |
21 |
4.00 |
4.95 |
|
10 |
10 |
25�Test administration |
86% |
100% |
18 |
21 |
3.83 |
4.90 |
|
|
9 |
20 |
27�Test interpretation |
91% |
100% |
19 |
20 |
3.84 |
4.70 |
|
|
15 |
30 |
28�Diagnosis (DSM-IV) |
90% |
95% |
18 |
20 |
3.17 |
4.00 |
|
|
3 |
8 |
Consultation |
29�Networking |
95% |
100% |
20 |
21 |
3.95 |
4.90 |
|
19 |
15 |
30�Referrals |
91% |
100% |
19 |
21 |
3.11 |
4.86 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
Supervision |
35�Conduct training workshops |
95% |
100% |
20 |
20 |
3.15 |
4.75 |
|
29 |
25 |
33�of site supervisors |
91% |
95% |
19 |
20 |
3.00 |
4.10 |
|
|
28 |
29 |
32�of supervisors |
86% |
96% |
18 |
20 |
3.00 |
4.05 |
|
|
27 |
31 |
31�of students |
91% |
96% |
19 |
20 |
3.00 |
4.00 |
|
|
36 |
34�Live supervision |
91% |
19 |
3.95 |
|||||
|
1 |
1 |
Professional Development |
42�Professional writing |
95% |
100% |
20 |
21 |
4.05 |
5.00 |
|
4 |
2 |
�Self-study |
39�Web-based research |
100% |
100% |
21 |
21 |
3.95 |
5.00 |
|
7 |
3 |
�Self-study |
40�Programs/software |
91% |
100% |
19 |
21 |
3.89 |
5.00 |
|
8 |
4 |
�Self-study |
38�Computer-related information/research |
100% |
100% |
21 |
21 |
3.86 |
5.00 |
|
21 |
7 |
�Self-study |
36�legal/ethical issues |
95% |
100% |
20 |
21 |
3.10 |
4.95 |
|
5 |
19 |
43�Professional listservs |
91% |
100% |
19 |
21 |
3.95 |
4.90 |
|
|
22 |
16 |
�Self-study |
37�reading books/journals |
95% |
100% |
20 |
21 |
3.10 |
4.86 |
|
23 |
17 |
41�Licensure/credentialing |
81% |
95% |
17 |
19 |
3.06 |
4.79 |
|
|
24 |
49�Continuing Education |
100% |
21 |
4.14 |
|||||
|
31 |
32 |
46�Self-evaluation/report |
81% |
91% |
17 |
19 |
3.00 |
4.00 |
|
|
33 |
45�Peer group supervision |
91% |
19 |
4.00 |
|||||
|
30 |
34 |
44�Attend workshops/conventions |
76% |
95% |
16 |
20 |
3.00 |
3.95 |
|
|
26 |
Professional Accountability�Report ethical violations |
50�to licensing boards |
86% |
18 |
4.06 |
||||
|
38 |
53�Therapeutic effectiveness reports |
95% |
19 |
3.53 |
|||||
|
45 |
52�Peer reviews of competency |
90% |
18 |
3.06 |
1
5 = Essential 4 = Very Helpful 3 = Helpful 2CRT (computer-related technology) 3 rank-ordered mean current ratings 4rank-ordered mean future ratings5
Total % responding 5, 4, or 3 for current use 6Total % responding 5, 4, or 3 for future use 7frequency count for current ratings 8frequency count for future ratings9
mean current ratings 10mean future ratings� Katherine Cabaniss
The URL for the dissertation is:
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-03072001-175713/