Performance Rubric for Portfolio Component 23: Consultation Field Experience

Criteria

Exceeds Expectation

Meets Expectation

In Progress

Comments

Originality

Presentation shows considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a unique and interesting way.

Presentation shows some originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in an interesting way.

Presentation is a rehash of other people's ideas and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original thought.

Buttons and Links Work Correctly

All buttons and links work correctly.

Most (80-95%) buttons and links work correctly.

Fewer than 80% of the buttons work correctly.

Font Choice and Formatting

Font formats (e.g., color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content.

Font formatting has been carefully planned to complement the content. It may be a little hard to read.

Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material.

Content: Consultation Field Experience

The component clearly articulates student involvement in a professional consultative experience. The documentation for the component is professional in nature, represents consultation strategies employed, and provides a strong reflection regarding student learning.

The component clearly represents a professional consultative experience and student participation is clearly documented. Reflection regarding the consultation theories employed and the value of the learning experience is weak.

The component does not clearly document actual participation in a consultation field experience. The experience is documented in a way that raises questions about the professionalism regarding student involvement.

Spelling and Grammar

Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.

Presentation has 1-2 grammatical errors or misspellings.

Presentation has more than 2 grammatical and/or spelling errors.

Global Comments: